Module#prepend is a feature added in Ruby 2.0. Until now i didn’t have an oportunity to try it. Turns out it’s pretty cool and useful!
When you call a method, Ruby looks on the receiver’s ancestor chain from left to right and invokes method from the first member which implements it.
If you call
super keyword inside a method Ruby invokes same method on next member which implements it. Unfortunately, there is no way how to call same method on previous member.
Now this is how ancestor chain might look in Ruby 2.0:
[object’s singleton class, prepended modules, object’s class itself, included modules, superclasses]
prepend a module it is actually inserted before the class itself in ancestor chain, not after as it’s with
include. Thus when you define same method in the prepended module and the class and then you call it the method from prepended module is actually invoked.
Before Ruby 2.0 this wouldn’t be possible.
I have few service classes which all have same structure. These classes serve as simple data modifiers. It’s something like this:
module Contact class PostalCodeNormalizer attr_accessor :raw, :modified, :invalid def intialize(raw_contacts) @raw = raw_contacts @modified =  @errors =  end def call raw.each do |contact_info| if contact_info[:postal_code].blank? errors << [contact_info, 'Postal code is missing!'] else contact_info[:postal_code].delete(' ') modified << contact_info end end if raw.size == (modified.size + errors.size) [modified, errors] else fail "sums aren't same" end end end end
I have a bunch of these with different functions. I chain them as i need, collect the modified data and errors and do something with them. But the size checking code at the end of
#call method is always the same.
Module#prepend it can be very nicely refactored:
module Contact module BaseModifier ... def call super if raw.size == (modified.size + errors.size) [modified, errors] else fail "sums aren't same" end end end class PostalCodeNormalizer prepend BaseModifier def call raw.each do |contact_info| if contact_info[:postal_code].blank? errors << [contact_info, 'Postal code is missing!'] else contact_info[:postal_code].delete(' ') modified << contact_info end end end end end
Module#prepend i would have to do something like this:
module Contact module BaseModifier ... def call do_call ... end def do_call fail 'implement in subclass' end end class PostalCodeNormalizer include BaseModifier def do_call ... end end end
Or something like this: Module.prepend: a super story
Have a good one!
Hi, i'm Premysl Donat and this is a place where i share things i find interesting.
This is my picture:
I release all of my code under MIT license and it's freely available at Github.
Have a good one, PremekFollow @DonatP Follow @Masa331